CITY OF
GLOUCESTER
FINAL
CONSERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES
WEDNESDAY,
FEBRUARY 16, 2005 - 6:30 PM
GLOUCESTER HIGH
SCHOOL LECTURE HALL
MAX SCHENK,
CHAIRMAN
MEMBERS PRESENT
Max Schenk, Chair
Ann Jo Jackson, Vice Chair
William Febiger
Elizabeth Steele
MEMBERS ABSENT
Arthur Socolow
Amy Donelly
STAFF PRESENT
Nancy Ryder, Conservation Agent
Katharine Irvine, Recording Clerk
§ Mr. Schenk called the meeting to order and reviewed items on the agenda.
§ See the Agent’s notes for additional submitted background information.
I. OLD COMMISSION BUSINESS
A. Request for Certificate of Compliance under the Local Wetlands Ordinance for File #28-1096: Barletta, #6 Squam Lane.
§ Certificate of Compliance under the Wetlands Protection Act has been applied for and granted through DEP.
§ Attorney Robert Visnick represented the owners of 4 Squam Lane.
§ Ms. Ryder recapped on the background of 6 Squam Lane.
§ Mr. Jackson sees no valid reason not to issue a certificate of compliance with the notation that the fill in the back of the property is not at the correct elevation as shown on the final plan but is outside the 100 ft. jurisdictional GCC buffer.
Motion - Ms. Jackson
Seconded
Vote- 4-0 to approved the Certificate of Compliance under the Local Wetlands Ordinance
B. Discussion of revising Local Ordinance fee schedule
§ The fees are currently inequitable,
§ For example, someone building a deck within the buffer zone pays the same fee as someone building a single family home with all associated work.
§ The Committee has proposed a plan breaking down the activity within the buffer zone into categories and corresponding fees, similar to the State.
§ Any project not listed would be a category 2.
§ N. Ryder is to use some sample projects to further clarify the fee schedule for the Committee and evaluate the difference to applicants and the city.
§ Site visits are suggested at a fee of $10.00 per visit with an estimate of three visits per project.
§ Would this be a full time position paid for by the $10.00 fee?
§ A part-time on-call position supported by the site visit fees is envisioned.
Mr. Schenk suggested holding a separate business meeting to discuss in detail issues that can't be resolved due to time constraints. A meeting will be held in the Community Development Conference Room on March 7, 2005 at 7:00 pm. Ms. Jackson suggested adding 20 minutes to the regularly scheduled meetings to cover Commission business.
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES/OTHER
A. Minutes of 2/2
Tabled until the March 2, 2005 meeting.
B. Review of courtesy local environmental reviewers list and current third party consultant list.
§ One list is for third party representation for the Commission in matters of dispute.
§ The second list is for area wetland consultants for third party review.
§ Criteria for being on the third party review list; completely objective and honest regardless of whom hired. Attention to site and regulatory detail that borders on neurotic.
§ Third party consultants wishing to be added to the list should submit a resume, evidence that they comply with the necessary criteria and recommendations.
§ A quarterly review will be held at one of the May 2005 meetings.
III. CLOSURE OF HEARINGS, REVIEW OF FINAL INFORMATION, AMENDMENT AND SIGNING PERMITS/DECISIONS
Gloucester Little League project on Dr. Osman Babson Road
§ Approved at the February 2, 2005 meeting. Permit was signed.
Russell Morris' project on 570 Essex Avenue (Map 236, Lot 107)
§ Approved at the February 2, 2005 meeting.
§ Ms. Ryder made a site visit and work has commenced within the buffer without permit or erosion control.
§ The RRA is being used as a stockpile area
§ She feels that while the owner was a little too eager and did not wait for a permit, he made a good faith effort to correct the issue and remove stockpiled soils back as soon as he was notified.
§ There is still potential for soils going down the slope.
§ Ms. Jackson recommended letting the matter proceed with a stern warning.
Motion to continue
Seconded, and
Unanimously Voted: To continue to the next meeting to make sure all corrections and erosion control are in place.
David & Morgan Pike at 614 Western Avenue
No outstanding or changed issues. Permit signed. Project is not scheduled to commence until summer.
Carrigan Enterprises for 14 Tufts Lane (Map 115, Lot 30; Map 125, Lots 22 and 71).
§ Draft decisions under state and local laws and ordinances prepared separately
§ Final approval from legal not obtained yet.
§ Since there are seven days remaining, Ms. Ryder requested a continuance and requested a formal time to review documents.
§ Mrs. Steele seconded the request to continue in order to have more time to adequately review the documents.
§ A meeting was scheduled for Friday, February 18th at 7:00pm in the Community Development Office.
§ It was motioned by Mr. Febiger, Seconded by Ms. Steele and Unanimously Voted: To continue to Friday, February 18th at 7:00pm in the Community Development Office.
IV. PUBLIC COMMENT
There were no guests wishing to offer public comment.
V. CORRESPONDENCE
§ Ms. Jackson drafted a letter from Conservation regarding the Shellfish Constable issue. After review and discussion, the letter was approved and signed.
§ Mr. Schenk has been nominated for volunteer of the year for Coastal Resource Management and will be recognized in Washington, D.C.
§ In the interest of time Ms.Ryder will not review correspondence in detail but will review at the scheduled business meeting.
VI. VIOLATIONS
§ Will be reviewed at the business meeting.
VII. REQUESTS FOR DETERMINATION
A.
Judith Bouchie to replace septic system at 3 St. Joseph
Lane (Map 174, Lot 39).
§ Mr. Judd, Gateway engineering represented Ms. Bouchie of 159 Concord Street.
§ Information in the agent’s notes was discussed, please reference for additional details.
§ Mr. Judd described the spread of the effluent. Discussion ensued regarding location of the pool.
§ Ms. Ryder stated that there was no benefit in moving the pool from one place to the other. Even though it is not an ideal place for a septic system, it meets the requirements.
§ There is no place on the lot where there would be less impact.
§ The existing system will be pumped out, removed and replaced.
§ Full data from the Board of Public health on any special conditions is to be submitted.
§ Preservation of the three trees outside of the proposed system. Mr. Judd concurred that this was part of the plan.
§ Ms. Jackson suggested shrubbery at the base of the slope as part of erosion control. Ms. Ryder will provide a list of plants that thrive on that type of nutrient loading and moisture.
§ The birch tree would have to be replaced with nursery stock sized trees.
§ Mr. Schenk reviewed the Board of Health decision to confirm that they believe there would be no adverse effects to resources in the area.
§ Ms. Ryder suggested a second barrier at T2 to the property line.
§ Any areas that are disturbed will be loamed and seeded within 21 days.
§ Mr. Febiger asked when work would commence. Mr. Judd responded that the project site will have to dry out and projects work to commence in the spring.
Motion: Mr. Febiger moved for a negative determination, subject to the following conditions; shrub line place at T-2 flag to the property to system and wetlands; sand over clear area would be retained; four trees to be removed and replaced; no disturb zone beyond the hay bale line; all plantings including shrub line trees would be in consultation with the agent; full data on special conditions from the BOH based on two systems located in proximately to the resource to be submitted.
Second:
VOTED: 4-0 motioned carried.
B. Charles & Marge Bishop request the Commission to determine the applicability of the Wetlands Protection Act and the local Wetlands Ordinance to install septic tank at 159 Concord Street (Map 242, Lot 47).
§ Mr. Judd described the project, which is the replacement of a failed septic system.
§ Ms. Ryder expressed concern regarding measured site dimensions versus dimensions submitted on the plan from the stream exit on the side of the property where it exits and the re-enters the culvert.
§ Ms. Ryder requested a site visit with the applicants
§ There is a tremendous potential for impact to the wetlands due to the stream flow, which does have regulatory protection where it is exposed.
§ Ms. Steele suggested extending the hale bale line to more of a "C" position in order to be opened and closed on a daily basis.
§ The Conservation Commission requests the applicant have the plan reviewed by the Shellfish Commission
§ A copy of Board of Health conditions is to be submitted.
Motion: Mr. Schenk, for a negative determination with conditions that a revised plan of erosion control, detail construction narrative and schedule, copy of the conditions by the BOH be submitted, and an on-site visit with the agent take place.
Second: Febiger
VOTED: 4-0 motioned carried.
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Castleview Homeowners Association to repair and
repave the existing road located at Map 257, Lot 248, known as Massachusetts
Avenue.
B. Castleview Homeowners Association to repair and repave the existing road located at Map 258, known as Massachusetts Avenue.
Motion: Mr. Schenk motioned to continue until April 6th at 9:00pm.
Second: Ms. Steele
VOTED: 4-0 motion carried
IX. CONTINUED ITEMS
A. PUBLIC HEARING: Bernard Sova to reconstruct existing residential buildings, raise floors above the 100 yr. Flood zone and add cantilevered decks at 4 Stanwood Point (Map 230, Lot 69).
The Community Development Dept has received a request for a continuation to March 16.
Motioned - Ms. Jackson until March 16th at 9:00am
Second - Febiger
VOTED: 4-0 motion granted.
B. REQUEST FOR DETERMINATION: Sam Park & Company, LLC request the Commission to determine the applicability of the Wetlands Protection Act and the local Wetlands Ordinance to land behind Fuller School at Map 262, Lot 13 and to perform grading at that site.
§ Ms. Michelle Harrison, Attorney represented Sam Park & Company, LLC.
§ At a previous meeting GCC and the applicant decided on a third party peer review
§ Ms. Ryder provided Ms. Harrison with a list of acceptable third party reviewers, however, none were satisfactory to applicant.
§ Atty. Harrison has submitted a revised list
§ Mr. Schenk remarked that there are two matters at hand - the selection of third party reviewer and whether or not an applicant can add a reviewer to the list
§ Atty. Harrison felt that there might be a perceived conflict of interest relative to two of the reviewers on the list provided by the Commission. In addition, Waterman does not have a wetlands scientist currently employed with them and New England Environmental's distance from the project is too far.
§ Ms. Ryder reminded the committee that although the applicant funds the reviewer, the reviewer is actually working for the Commission.
§ Ms. Steele is comfortable with all of the reviewers on Attorney Harrison's alternate list and suggested Curt Young.
§ Ms. Jackson concurred with the suggestion of Mr. Young and /or Mr. Lowry. Ms. Harrison suggests someone who is familiar with our local ordinance.
§ Mr. Schenk requested a suggestion for a "standout".
§ Ms. Ryder noted that if you take the top five ranked from both lists, ConCom and applicants alternative, remove those with a stated conflict, you come up with Denis Lowry of ENSR International. The GCC reviewed and concurred.
Motioned; Mr. Febiger moved to accept Sam Park and Company, LLC proposal to use Denis Lowry of ENSR International Consultants.
Second:
Voted 4-0
Ms. Harrison requested a continuance until March 2, 2005
Motion: Mr. Schenk motioned to continue until March 2,2005 at 9:30
Second: Mr.Febinger
Voted: 4-0
X. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. William Wainwright to construct addition and deck at 25 Jebeka Lane
§ Matt Ding (check last name, not correct) represents the Wainwright's
§ The project is for construction of addition and deck at Jebeka Lane.
§ A site walk was held on the previous Saturday with the Commission.
§ Project specifications and highlighted changes that were submitted to Ms.Ryder’s office were reviewed.
§ The Wainwright’s have agreed to replace the cedar tree located on the property and replace any shrubbery that has to be cut back as a result of the project with Cedars.
§ Ms. Steele had a concern regarding the location of the project footings and it's relation to the sewer drain.
§ The drain from the shed is connected to the on-site septic system
§ Ms. Ryder reviewed the overlapping resources on site; Riverfront Resource, ACEC, Coastal Bank – She noted that the regs state that there can be no closer impact especially within the first 100 feet. If there are no alternatives an applicant must minimize and mitigate.
§ The GCC should start at phase one and verify that an alternative has been done. There has to be a mitigating reason why the deck on the cottage has to be located where requested.
§ The applicant noted that the additions were consistent and associated with existing single family home.
§ There were invasive shrubs at the location of the proposed deck not native natural vegetation. There is honeysuckle in the back and cedars on the side. All Honeysuckle will be removed and replaced with native vegetation.
§ The Cedars will be replaced at a 2:1 ratio.
§ Mr. Schenk opened the hearing to public comment, none
§ Ms. Steele asked Ms. Ryder what her opinion was.
§ The project would meet the regulations if built off the back rather than the front.
Motioned: Steele, to approve the project with the stipulation of 2 to 1 replacement of vegetation. Removal of invasive honeysuckle near the cottage and two cedar trees at the front main house and elsewhere on the site for each tree removed
Seconded: Ms. Jackson
VOTED: 4-0
Motion: Ms. Steele to continue above until March 2nd at 7:05 for signature of permit
Second: Mr. Febiger
VOTED: 4-0
B. Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc. For excavation and off-site disposal of impacted oil and sediment, followed by back fill and restoration of the wetland and buffer zones at undeveloped lots located at 63 Grove Street and 95 Maplewood Ave. (Map 41, Lots 9 and 7).
This hearing will be continued, as the response from the applicant’s attorney has not yet been received.
Mr. Schenk requested motion to continue,
Motion: Mr. Febiger continue until March 2, 2005 until 10:00pm.
Second: Ms. Jackson
VOTED: 4-0
C. Sharon & Joel Swan's plans to construct an addition at 648 Essex Avenue (Map 238, Lot 4) under DEP File #28-1183.
§ Mr. Swan is here as a continuation of Public Hearing of February 3, 2005.
§ See Agent’s notes for additional information.
§ Applicant is asking for waiver the agent did not approve it because the project must be filed as a new project and reviewed entirely. Ms. Ryder had suggested the applicant request a waiver from the GCC if they felt it was unreasonable.
§ The site is as depicted on the plan; however, the pond has an intermittent stream running through the pond. It starts across the cart path, is culverted under, goes through the pond and comes out behind neighboring houses.
§ From a regulatory standpoint it is an intermittent stream.
§ The project is extremely close to the resource area
§ There is potential for a vegetative buffer, which will provide additional protection to the resource area.
§ The Commission members studied the plans and asked for recommendations for type of vegetation.
§ Ms. Ryder suggested low growing, dense vegetation along the line including perennial beds. Mrs. Swan reviewed site map and clarified shrubbery placement.
§ Ms. Swan asked if the Commission could revisit after snow cover however Ms. Ryder pointed out that the density of this shrubbery would need to be year-round as opposed to seasonal.
§ She recommended approving the plan with the condition that the applicants return with a planting plan prior to the start of work.
§ Mr.Schenk opened the hearing to public comment, none
Ms. Steele motioned to approved, on the conditions that landscaping plan be submitted to agent for review and with no future disturbance beyond the vegetated buffer.
Second: Mr. Febiger
Discussion - Amended to include stockpiled rocks moved to the Northeast corner of the property adjacent to Essex Ave.
VOTED: 4-0
This has been continued to March 2nd at 7:05 for signing and closure of the hearing.
§ Issue of fee abatement was addressed
§ Ms. Swan explained her reasoning for asking for a waiver.
§ Ms. Swan felt there was a disparity between previous Commission and current Commission.
§ Mrs. Swan recounted the cost of the previous filing.
§ Ms. Ryder responded that filing fees have changed and that this is a whole new hearing.
§ Ms. Ryder also reminded the applicant that the burden of proof is upon the applicant.
§ Ms. Jackson also added that the reason that applications expire in three years is because wetlands can change within that time frame.
§ Ms. Steele suggested lowering filing fee to $300 from $400.
§ Ms. Ryder responded that while she was not opposed, the action could be precedent setting. The GCC should consider future implications.
§ Mrs. Swan stated that they were looking for a reasonable agreement.
§ Ms. Jackson questioned whether fee setting would have to go through City Council?
§ Ms. Ryder responded that yes it would, and she was hoping to have the fee schedule before council within three months.
Ms. Jackson moves to waive $100.00 made up of two $50.00 fees on the grounds that shellfish and public waters are not disturbed.
Seconded: Febiger
VOTED: 4-0
XI. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING
A. John Buckner to construct addition at 84 Magnolia
Avenue
§ Mr. Buckner represented himself concerning an addition to 84 Magnolia Avenue.
§ He hired a wetlands scientist and deferred to his description.
§ Mr. Henry Barbaro introduced himself and submitted an outline of the original condition of the intermittent stream and described his findings.
§ Sensitive fern, is present in the front corner near the, is indicative of wetland, however, soil sampling has determined that is not hydric.
§ Mr. Buckner would like to raise the elevation of the front yard for parking and turnaround, with fill to levels 5 and 6 consistent with the rest of house section of the property.
§ This would have a rise of two to three inches higher than Magnolia Avenue.
§ Ms. Ryder did find wetland but it is being fed by surface water from the roadway.
§ She believes the lower area is not fill from her soil samples and thinks it clearly hydric soil with some wetland vegetation. The wetlands do seem to be seasonal. Ms.Ryder's professional opinion is that the area immediately adjacent to the house is suitable for an addition but recommends restricting activity to elevation 4 and above.
§ Ms. Ryder suggests using the front and back to stockpile
§ Ms. Jackson asked if the last couple of feet could be cantilevered out?
§ Mr. Barbareau questioned the BVW consideration Ms Ryder compared her findings.
§ The Commission is happy to entertain a motion to continue until spring.
§ Mr. Schenk reminded Mr. Buckner that the cantilever approach is reasonable.
§ Issues that need to be addressed include working out sequencing, applying BMPs, material excavated will be brought to the front for fill area.
§ The fill will be trucked out and replaced with clean fill.
§ Mr. Febiger asked to review driveway plans. The driveway will include a gravel turnaround and/or perhaps a half circle.
§ Details need to be placed on the plan.
§ Modifications regarding curb cut need to be included.
§ Standard conditions to apply as well.
§ Loam and seed within 21 days of cessation of work.
§ Matting over lower high ground water lawn areas, for temporary construction vehicle access.
§ Mitigation vegetated buffer zone adjacent to stream bank.
§ Mr. Buckner requested another site visit as the buffer zone encroaches on the only flat and currently usable area of his yard.
§ Mr. Barbaro questioned what ““ a “no mow” zone of 25 feet would achieve. He felt since the area was always used as a yard, it would be reasonable to strike a compromise and still achieve a "win-win" situation.
Motioned: Mr. Febiger motioned to continue for further construction detail, use of BMPS, layout of buffer along stream and layout of driveway.
Seconded: Ms. Steele
Voted: 4-0 continued until March 2, 2005.
XII. NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Steven Reicher to raze/rebuild dwelling at 20 Riggs
Point Road (Map 112, Lot 82).
§ Mr. William J. Manuell, Wetland Scientist is representing Mr. & Mrs.
§ See agent’s notes for additional comments.
§ The project is over 125 feet from wetland but within the outer 100 feet of the Riverbank.
§ There is a lot of bedrock so the house will not have a foundation.
§ Siltation fence for traffic and debris control.
§ There is no place on lot where this home could comply with zoning and not be within the outer 100 feet of riverfront, therefore, intention is to replace existing structure.
§ Ms. Ryder asked for clarification on location of the trees currently on site. Particularly one large black cherry tree.
§ Ms. Steele asked Mr.Manuell to describe the paved area to which he complied.
§ Mr. Schenk asked if the applicant was willing to replant if possible, he responded, of course. Something more appropriate might be a cedar.
§ Open of to public comment. There was none
§ Mr. Schenk commented that biggest issue is the black cherry tree.
§ Ms. Jackson was comfortable with replacement with a cedar.
§ Ms. Ryder suggested a variance to shift deck over in order to save the existing large tree. Mr. Manuell was inclined to maintain the integrity of the design, as a shift would change the roofline and aesthetics.
§ Mr. Schenk would like to see a two to one replacement of existing tree canopy on lot as well as two to one replacement for vegetation being lost.
§ Mr. Manuell feels that this is the wrong interpretation of the regulations.
§ Discussion ensued regarding the application of riverfront regulations 10.538B.
§ Mr. Manuell suggested selecting three trees with a five-foot diameter of vegetation around the trees in addition to the two to one replacement of existing tree canopy.
§ The Commission agreed.
Motion: Ms. Jackson motioned approve Steven Reicher to raze/rebuild dwelling at 20 Riggs Point Road (Map 112, Lot 82) with the condition of the downspout directed to lawn area/filtration garden, two to one replacement of cherry tree, three trees selected for under planting of five feet in diameter.
Second: Mr. Febiger
VOTED: 4-0
B. Michael Scognamiglio to construct seasonal dock extension at 91 Riverview Road (Map 93, Lot 2).
§ Mr. Manuell is representing Michael Scognamiglio
§ Project is to construct seasonal dock extension at 91 Riverview Road of 60 feet sufficient to meet deep water.
§ Mr. Scognamiglio was given a positive determination by the Commission previously but is requesting construction of new floats extending out 60 feet and turning pier perpendicular to the headlands.
§ These floats will be installed seasonally over mudflats (working clam flats).
§ Mr. Manuell described method in which installation will not impact mudflats, coastal bank, beach or shellfish utilizing system of skid timber. This structure will be anchored my three greenhead piles, installed with a vibratory driver, which is resistant to rot and contains no chemical preservatives. Lubrication pile driver is vegetable based. Mr. Manuell suggests this project is compliant with applicable waterway regulations and consistent with the City.
§ Ms. Ryder reported the Mr. Knowles and Mr. Burlingham have spoken against this project due to the extent of clam flat disturbance and the cumulative impact of such a project on the river, when everyone on the river once to get out to their deep water boat with a similar dock project.
§ Ms. Ryder suggests a recommendation from both CZM and the Shellfish Advisory Board.
§ Ms. Jackson suggested rotating the existing dock 90 degrees in order to reach closer to mean low water.
§ Ms. Ryder added that pilings have consistently not been allowed to be located in area below the tall cord grass.
§ She noted that docks have been permitted at 10x15 to allow reasonable use to those who live on the river but to also protect the open public clam-flats, which are also a protected public resource.
§ Mrs. Scognamiglio recommended having not only the CZM and Shellfish Advisory but also the Division of Marine Fisheries under Chapter 91. Mrs. Scognamilgio has already sought approval of the Waterways Commission and the DEP is waiting to hear from them.
§ Ms. Steele reminded him that the regulations for waterways and those for GCC had different goals.
§ Open to public comment:
§ Alicia Padre, 38 Cherry Street shared concern for the impact of this project upon the clam-flats and how this project might influence other neighbors along the river without direct access to deep water.
§ Mr. Schenk closed the public comment period.
§ Mr.Schenk would like to see input from the Shellfish Constable, CZM and Marine Fisheries put in writing.
§ Mr. Schenk moved for a continuance of approximately one month until April 6 at 8:00 pm and requested an update of the plans for this site in current time.
Motioned; Jackson
Seconded: Steele
Voted: 4-0
C. Michael Scognamiglio to amend Order of Conditions 28-1647 for 8 Sandy Way (Map 257, Lot 218).
§ Mr. Manuell is also representing Mr. Scognamilgio to amend the order of conditions 28-1647 for 8 Sandy Way (Map 257, Lot 218) to expand area of drive in one area and decrease in another area filling with pea stone.
§ Asking for 100sq. ft. more than initially approved.
§ Will relocate 10 inch Austrian pine tree and relocate any compatible material.
§ The Commission discussed the project and did not object as long as all vegetation was replanted or replaced on site.
§ Open for public comment. None. Closed.
§ Mr. Febiger motioned to approve amend the order of conditions 28-1647 for 8 Sandy Way (Map 257, Lot 218) with the condition that all vegetation be moved or replaced in kind subject to nonmortality for two years for vegetation, but three years for trees, subject to pea stone driveway, no impervious.
Motioned: Febiger
Second: Steele
VOTED: 4-0
XIII. CERTIFICATES OF COMPLIANCE AND EXTENSION PERMITS
Ms. Ryder requests a continuation of the above Certificates of Compliance until the March 2, 2005 Meeting following all public hearings.
Motioned: Jackson
Second: Febiger
VOTE: 4-0
XIV. REQUEST FOR MINOR AMENDMENT TO ORDER OF CONDITIONS
A. Steve McCarthy requests a minor amendment to plan
for DEP File #28-1502, project located at 2 Lighthouse Way (previously known as
46 Eastern Point Road).
§ Mr. McCarthy recapped his project to install narrow four-foot wide farmer's porches.
§ See agent’s notes.
§ Foundation no closer to resource area and does not exceed impervious footprint of what was originally permitted.
§ Mr. McCarthy explained that he shortened the foundation four feet in order in tuck back into the lot and provide a more aesthetically pleasing appearance.
§ Ms. Steele remarked that this is a relatively minor revision after acceptance of the plan.
§ Ms. Ryder does not see a negative impact on the environment with respect to the wetland, the porches and infiltration issues but does see a possible neighbor issue with respect to the back porch, however..
Motioned: Ms. Jackson moved to accept minor amendment to plan for DEP File #28-1502, project located at 2 Lighthouse Way (previously known as 46 Eastern Point Road) with the condition that infiltration must occur onsite away from wetlands utilizing downspouts and drywells to be indicated on an amended plan. The foundation has been resited and cobblestone allowable.
Seconded: Febiger
VOTED: 4-0
XV. OTHER COMMISSION BUSINESS
§ Ms. Ryder commented on changes to the Wetlands Protection Act.
§ A draft revision of the ordinance and draft regulations should be at the Commission Subcommittee level within three months for review.
§ Rockport ConCom requested a site visit to where the Massachusetts highway department has dumped debris, snow and sand into a Wetland on the Rockport/Gloucester line. Please reference notes.
MOVE TO ADJOURN 12:28 AM